Since this weekend is the 37th annual Atlanta Gay Pride festival, I thought I would reflect a little on pride, and what better way to do that, that with an article a flickr pal of mine sent to me about the biology of homosexuality? The article talks about current studies that are being conducted, many of which are looking at various biological trends in humans that indicate a biological representation of homosexuality. It builds on the studies from the past that looked at things like the differences in the hypothalamus (which was seen to be noticably different in homosexual men), and also looks at other interesting things potentially linked to your propensity to be gay, like being the youngest boy in your family, the length of your fingers, the direction of the whorl in your hair, and many other biological traits. What it goes on to show, is that the representation of these traits are sometimes significantly different for gay men, and even lesbian women, and as such, may prove to be biological markers that can be used to truly say that homosexuality is biologically determined.
While there is a lot covered in the article, and there are a lot of different points made, I thought it was interesting that first of all, we need to prove that homosexuality is somehow biological. I see how this proof would end the discussion that homosexuality was a choice, but it does open up a whole new can of worms, which is best summed up with this statement from the article:
If sexual orientation is biological, and we are learning to identify how it happens inside the uterus, doesn’t it suggest a future in which gay people can be prevented?
It appears that there is also some research looking at the possibility of genetic markers that “cause” homosexuality, and while they aren’t confirmed, it does sound both intriguing, and scary at the same time. I for one can’t imagine what would happen if it turns out that homosexuality is inherently genetic, and they do, then, start searching for a cure. (Additionally, I should note that the conclusion that lesbians are somehow “less homosexual” or even “more fluid” with their sexuality, because they haven’t identified as many markers in women is NOT something I endorse or agree with. Jumping to conclusions without research to back it up is dangerous and stupid.)
The whole notion of “curing homosexuality” is a scary thing, because I for one, don’t think that homosexuality is a disease, and as such, it certainly doesn’t need a “cure”. I am extremely proud of who I am, and being gay is a large part of that. I think that if I were meant to be born straight, I would have been. Plain and simple. I know that everyone doesn’t share my sentiment, especially those that hate themselves because they were born gay, but think about this: being gay, if it is truly biological, is essentially the same as if you were born black, red-haired, blue-eyed, female, or any other non-harmful biologically identifiable trait. The point is, that if it was meant to be, it would be. That is the way nature works.
But what about diseases, and genetically defective biological traits that can be identified and cured? Does this mean that I think that we should just let those diseases that can be prevented with genetic suppression go unchecked? No, I think that is a different argument, mainly because being gay has absolutely no provable detriment to a person’s life; other than, of course, the environmental and external influences that affect us. And we all know that just because you are gay doesn’t mean that you will be subjected to these influences, and just because you are straight, doesn’t mean you will be immune to them.
While being gay may be a “harder” life because of all that we face; discrimination, degradation, violence, hatred, etc, it is a life that we have lived, and because of what we go through, it shapes us into who we are. We are made up of both our biological selves that were given to us at birth, and we grow and are shaped by our experiences, and become who we are by combination of the two.
Now, I know for a fact that my experiences didn’t make me gay, but, they did happen to me because I am gay, and they helped me become who I am today. I am a proud, out, gay man, and I know what I know because of the journey I have been on to this point in my life. It is the journey, and what I have made from it, that I celebrate this weekend, and it is my hope that this important aspect of each gay person’s life is not lost if and when biological determinants are truly, and irrefutably identified.
Unfortunately, I am realistic about the world we live in, and I fear that the hateful, bigoted, religious extremists will force the issue of screening for these biological traits, in an effort to make gay people inferior. Even more, I fear that they will go further, and try to eliminate gay people from being born.
I hope that just because we identify that being gay isn’t because “you took dance instead of playing basketball”, and that it is because “you were born biologically homosexual”; people will NOT seek to eliminate the biological traits that make us special, unique, and wonderful.
Being gay is being different.
Being gay is being who we were born to be.
Being gay is who I am.
Being gay is who many others are as well.
Being gay is normal.
We are no less human, nor any less worthy of our lives as gay people, than anyone who is black, female, blonde haired, or left-handed is worthy of their life as who they were born. I hope that we can continue to live in a diverse world that begins to see these studies as a means of acceptance, and not as a means of elimination.
Given the tone this article has the potential to set, I for one, want to focus on the pride that I have for who I am, the community that I identify myself with, and what it means to sit here, typing this post as a proud gay man. It has been a long journey, but I know that I have a long way to go; and I couldn’t be happier that I get to take the journey myself. This weekend, I will celebrate this with my fellow gays in Atlanta, and it will be a beautiful thing. After the weekend, I will tell you all about it. Come out and see us if you can!
Happy Pride, y’all.
You have come such a long way Duane, from the skinny, scared guy that I knew. Your blog today is wonderful and uplifting. I hope that they can’t “cure” gay someday. The world is so much more colorful with all types of people. I do consider myself a religious person and to all the people screaming that gay is against God, I say this: Our commandemnts say “THOU SHALT NOT JUDGE”. Corinthians 13:4-7 says in a nut shell that love is pure, true and never fades. Love never fails. So no matter who you are or who you love, God loves you for it. Have fun this weekend and know that I support you and your community.
I am a closeted straight man and went to pride a few years ago with some other straight friends (we have a lot of gay friends, plus the music and such.) The one thing I remember is the uncomfortable feeling I got after some unwanted leering and commentary. I’d probably feel just as awkward if women did it…
gaymo
At this point in my life any leering would be welcome!
And what exactly is a closeted straight man?
Duane,
I wish I could come and party with y’all down there. The big Pride parade in Toronto is Sunday, which will mark the end of 10 days of Pride celebrations here this year. I’m hoping my eye is better so I can go and be there in person, instead of watching it from home on television.
Be proud of yourself… I know I am proud of all of you out there.
And that’s the point of view of a grumpy gay male in the great white north
I don’t believe in God or “meant to be”, but I do believe in how I am. It took me a while to get here, and I wouldn’t change a thing. I think a world without gay (or without ANY part of the world’s wonderful diversity) would indeed be sad.
If a “cure” ever does exist, it will highlight the hypocrisy of the religious, because they’ll be the first to start manipulating a fetus to their own ends, even though they scream the loudest about the rights of the unborn now. Who are they to decide how that person will live its life? It still amazes me that these Christians take a few obscure lines from a Bronze Age text (one that I don’t ascribe to) to marginalize my life and restrict my rights. And they conveniently ignore practically EVERYTHING that Jesus said. He’s like their main guy, right? Check out the Sermon on the Mount, bitches, and then tell me how I should be. It’s practically unimaginable arrogance, except it’s right there in front of us every day.
Hey Michael, not all Christians are like that
I don’t disagree with any of the points you make in your post, but (without having read the article) it seems that you jumped to a conclusion that identifying genetic traits is the first step in eliminating the gay population. While some might try to take that path, my first thought was a bit different.
Imagine if when picking surrogates or sperm donors, or when adpoting a child, a potential parent could increase the likelihood of having gay children. I also think it could have some positive implications in child and adolescent psychology.
Just 2 cents from a new reader.
Thanks for your comment Sarah. I don’t think that I was jumping to that conclusion without merit; people would go in that direction, especially because (as the article points out), that people that are okay with gay people are more likely to believe that it is biological. I definitely see your point, and it is a good one as well; I was drawing my opinion from my own fears about what it could mean (which are echoed in the article).
Thanks again for you comment, and I look forward to more!!